Appellate Law NJ Blog
  • Home
  • Bruce Greenberg

Three Supreme Court Decisions in Criminal Cases

Posted by Bruce D. Greenberg on Jun 22, 2022 in Constitutional law, Criminal law, Effect of decisions by other courts, Judges, Standards of review, Statutory interpretation, Supreme Court of New Jersey | 0 comments

The last few days have seen three opinions by the Supreme Court in criminal appeals. Here are summaries of those decisions:

State v. Rivas, ___ N.J. ___ (2022). This opinion by Justice Albin today, for a unanimous Court, reversed the decisions of the Law Division and the Appellate Division that had denied defendant’s motion to suppress his confession. In a fact-intensive decision, the Court applied the principle of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), that if “an accused has invoked his right to have counsel present during custodial interrogation,” questioning must cease and cannot resume “until counsel has been made available to him, unless the accused himself initiates further communication, exchanges, or conversations with the police.” On the facts here, the Court said, defendant’s suppression motion should have been granted.

State v. Bailey, ___ N.J. ___ (2022). This official misconduct case centered on the effect of an amendment to N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22 that led to an amendment to New Jersey Evidence Rule 509. That amendment created a crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege. The issue here was whether that amendment and its crime-fraud exception, applied to text messages exchanged between defendant and her husband before the Legislature enacted the amendment. In a unanimous opinion by Justice Patterson, the Court held that there was no evidence that the Legislature intended the amendment to apply retroactively. The Law Division had permitted the text messages to be admitted into evidence based on the amendment, and the Appellate Division had affirmed that decision. Though that was error, the Supreme Court found it to be harmless, since there was “extensive evidence” that supported conviction.

State v. Lane, ___ N.J. ___ (2022). This was another retroactivity opinion by Justice Patterson. In this matter, the question was whether a 2020 amendment to N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1, which added a new mitigating factor to be weighed with other aggravating and mitigating factors in determining a sentence, applied to defendant. The new mitigating factor was that “[t]he defendant was under 26 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense,” and the Legislature stated that “[t]his new act shall take effect immediately.” Defendant, who was under age 26 at the time of his sentence, appealed that sentence, and that appeal was pending when the statutory amendment occurred. Defendant asserted that he should get the benefit of the amendment. The Appellate Division rejected that argument, finding the amendment to be prospective only. Applying de novo review, the Supreme Court agreed. Nothing in the language of the amendment indicated an intent that it apply retroactively, and the “take effect immediately” statement signified prospective application only. Justice Albin filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. He agreed that the amendment was to apply prospectively only, but stated that “in those cases where the defendants’ sentencing appeals were pending when the new law took ‘effect,’ prospective application does not and should not foreclose the Appellate Division from considering whether, in a particular case, the failure of a trial judge to consider a defendant’s youth as a mitigating factor resulted in a clearly excessive sentence.”


Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Bruce D. Greenberg, a partner of Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC, has more than 35 years of appellate experience.  He has argued dozens of cases in New Jersey’s Appellate Division, and he has handled oral arguments in the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals as well.  Mr. Greenberg’s appellate cases have ranged from . . more

 

Subscribe

  • reader reader
  • Subscribe to Appellate Law NJ Blog by Email

Archives

Links

  • An Appeal to Reason – California Appellate blog
  • Class Action Blawg
  • De Novo- Virginia Appellate Law blog
  • Florida Appellate Review
  • How Appealing
  • Maine Appeals Blog
  • New York Appellate Law blog
  • NJ Judiciary
  • On Brief – Iowa Appellate Law Blog
  • Third Circuit Blog
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Categories

  • Administrative agency actions
  • Administrative matters
  • Appellate Division
  • Attorneys fees
  • Case management
  • Chancery issues
  • Class actions
  • Constitutional law
  • Consumer protection
  • Contract interpretation
  • Criminal law
  • Discovery
  • Effect of decisions by other courts
  • Judges
  • Jury issues
  • Municipal land use
  • Notable opinion writing
  • Pleadings
  • Practice Pointers
  • Standards of review
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Summary judgment
  • Supreme Court of New Jersey
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Uncategorized
  • United States Supreme Court

Tags

Administrative agency actions Arbitration Briefs Chief Justice Stuart Rabner Court Rules Family Part interlocutory vs. final decisions Judge Allison Accurso Judge Anthony Parrillo Judge Carmen Alvarez Judge Carmen Messano Judge Clarkson Fisher Judge D. Brooks Smith Judge Douglas Fasciale Judge Ellen Koblitz Judge Heidi Willis Currier Judge Jack Sabatino Judge Jose Fuentes Judge Julio Fuentes Judge Kent Jordan Judge Marianne Espinosa Judge Marie Lihotz Judge Mary Catherine Cuff Judge Michael Haas Judge Mitchel Ostrer Judge Stephen Skillman Judge Susan Reisner Judge Thomas Ambro Judge Thomas Hardiman Judge Victor Ashrafi Justice Anne Patterson Justice Barry Albin Justice Fabiana Pierre-Louis Justice Faustino Fernandez-Vina Justice Helen Hoens Justice Jaynee LaVecchia Justice Lee Solomon Justice Walter Timpone Law of the case Makeup of court Notice of appeal Prerogative writ appeals Standing Statute of limitations Waiver

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by Wordpress