LinkedIn Social Share

The First Two Supreme Court Grants of Review of the New Term


The Supreme Court announced that it has granted certification in two cases.  These are the first grants (Nos. A-1 and A-2) of the current Term.

The first appeal is Garden State Check Cashing Service, Inc. v. New Jersey Dep’t of Banking & Insurance.  The question presented there, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office, is “Under the circumstances presented, was New Loan Co., Wm. S. Rich & Son, Inc. exempt from the statute prohibiting a check cashing business from locating within 2,500 feet of another, N.J.S.A. 17:15A-41(e), by operation of the statute’s “Grandfather Clause,” N.J.S.A. 17:15A-50(a)?”  The appeal arises from an unpublished, per curiam ruling by a two-judge Appellate Division panel involving the grant of licenses to New Loan Co. Wm. S. Rich & Son, Inc. at three locations: Irvington, Newark, and Union.  The panel affirmed the licenses as to the Newark and Union locations, but reversed as to Irvington.

The second matter is a criminal appeal, State v. Hyman, where the question presented is “Did the officer’s affidavit establish probable cause to issue a search warrant for defendant’s home, where the affidavit did not include a reference to criminal activity conducted at or near defendant’s residence?”  The Law Division denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, but a two-judge panel of the Appellate Division reversed in an unpublished opinion.  Now the Supreme Court will decide the issue.