Appellate Law NJ Blog
  • Home
  • Bruce Greenberg

Selection of Marijuana Alternative Treatment Center Operators Must Go Back to the Drawing Board

Posted by Bruce D. Greenberg on Nov 25, 2020 in Administrative agency actions, Appellate Division, Judges, Notable opinion writing, Standards of review | 0 comments

In re Application for Medical Marijuana Alternative Treatment Center for Pangaea Health & Wellness, LLC, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2020). On this relatively quiet day before Thanksgiving, the Appellate Division issued an opinion, by Judge Fisher, that overturns the Department of Health’s selection of operators of Alternative Treatment Centers “to grow, process, and dispense marijuana as part of the State’s Medicinal Marijuana Program.” The panel found that the Department’s system for scoring applicants produced “arbitrary results that have gone unexplained” by the Department. The deficient scoring process led to other errors as well.

This case actually comprises eight separate appeals. Judge Fisher’s comprehensive opinion, which discusses in detail the numerous issues raised by the parties, runs 75 pages. It is well worth reading in full.

The parties disputed the applicable standard of review, but Judge Fisher stated that even under “the most deferential standard-of review,” the results under the Department’s flawed scoring could not stand. Some of the appellants, who were all applicants who did not “make the cut,” asked the court to expand the list of approved operators by adding them. The number of operators had been limited by law to six, and Judge Fisher declined to alter that, stating that “it is not our place to alter the amount of permits that may issue; such questions reside with the Legislature and whatever direction given by the Legislature to the Department.”

Moreover, Judge Fisher said, given the pervasive deficiency of the scoring process, “it is far from clear that any further proceedings will move any appellant into the top six.” Accordingly, the Appellate Division vacated the decisions of the Department and remanded for “further administrative proceedings in conformity with the spirit of this opinion.” Absent a petition for certification to the Supreme Court, let the next round of the battle among putative operators begin.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Bruce D. Greenberg, a partner of Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC, has more than 35 years of appellate experience.  He has argued dozens of cases in New Jersey’s Appellate Division, and he has handled oral arguments in the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals as well.  Mr. Greenberg’s appellate cases have ranged from . . more

 

Subscribe

  • reader reader
  • Subscribe to Appellate Law NJ Blog by Email

Archives

Links

  • An Appeal to Reason – California Appellate blog
  • Class Action Blawg
  • De Novo- Virginia Appellate Law blog
  • Florida Appellate Review
  • How Appealing
  • Maine Appeals Blog
  • New York Appellate Law blog
  • NJ Judiciary
  • On Brief – Iowa Appellate Law Blog
  • Third Circuit Blog
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Categories

  • Administrative agency actions
  • Administrative matters
  • Appellate Division
  • Attorneys fees
  • Case management
  • Chancery issues
  • Class actions
  • Constitutional law
  • Consumer protection
  • Contract interpretation
  • Criminal law
  • Discovery
  • Effect of decisions by other courts
  • Judges
  • Jury issues
  • Municipal land use
  • Notable opinion writing
  • Pleadings
  • Practice Pointers
  • Standards of review
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Summary judgment
  • Supreme Court of New Jersey
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Uncategorized
  • United States Supreme Court

Tags

Administrative agency actions Appendix Arbitration Briefs Chief Justice Stuart Rabner Court Rules Family Part interlocutory vs. final decisions Judge Allison Accurso Judge Anthony Parrillo Judge Carmen Alvarez Judge Carmen Messano Judge Clarkson Fisher Judge D. Brooks Smith Judge Douglas Fasciale Judge Ellen Koblitz Judge Heidi Willis Currier Judge Jack Sabatino Judge Jose Fuentes Judge Julio Fuentes Judge Marianne Espinosa Judge Marie Lihotz Judge Mary Catherine Cuff Judge Mitchel Ostrer Judge Patty Shwartz Judge Stephen Skillman Judge Susan Reisner Judge Thomas Ambro Judge Thomas Hardiman Judge Victor Ashrafi Justice Anne Patterson Justice Barry Albin Justice Faustino Fernandez-Vina Justice Helen Hoens Justice Jaynee LaVecchia Justice Lee Solomon Justice Roberto Rivera-Soto Justice Walter Timpone Law of the case Makeup of court Notice of appeal Prerogative writ appeals Standing Statute of limitations Waiver

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by Wordpress