Appellate Law NJ Blog
  • Home
  • Bruce Greenberg

Offers of Judgment and High-Low Agreements

Posted by Bruce D. Greenberg on Feb 16, 2017 in Appellate Division, Attorneys fees, Contract interpretation, Judges, Practice Pointers, Standards of review | 0 comments

Serico v. Rothberg, 448 N.J. Super. 604 (App. Div. 2017).  In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff and defendant entered into a “high-low” agreement while awaiting a jury verdict.  As Judge Rothstadt noted in his opinion in this case today, such an agreement “guarantees a plaintiff a minimum recovery and limits a defendant’s exposure to an agreed upon amount, regardless of the jury’s award, if any.”  The low was $300,000 and the high was $1 million.  Before trial, plaintiff had offered to accept judgment for $750,000, inclusive of costs and prejudgment interest.  Defendant did not respond that offer.

The high-low agreement did not mention any possible award that plaintiff might get by virtue of the unaccepted offer of judgment (such an unaccepted offer can result in an award of litigation expenses from and after the date of non-acceptance, on top of whatever the jury awards, if a plaintiff recovers more than 120% of the amount of the offer).  The jury returned a $6 million verdict.  Under the high-low agreement, plaintiff was entitled to a $1 million judgment.

Plaintiff sought recovery of fees and costs under the offer of judgment rule, since $6 million far exceeded the $750,000 offer of judgment.  The Law Division denied plaintiff’s application.  There was no indication that the parties had agreed that plaintiff could recover fees and costs relating to the offer of judgment in addition to the high-low amount.  The judge cited that fact, his own lengthy experience as a litigator and judge, and the experience of other judges whom he consulted, in determining that absent an agreement that rights under an offer of judgment would survive after a high-low agreement, there is no such right.

Plaintiff appealed, and today the Appellate Division affirmed.  Judge Rothstadt applied the de novo standard of review and found error in the Law Division’s reliance on its own experience and that of other judges.  Still, the result below was correct, for different reasons.

The high-low agreement was a contract, to be interpreted just as any other contract.  Absent some expression to the contrary, the “basic assumption of high-low agreements” is that a plaintiff cannot recover more than the high.  Judge Rothstadt cited cases where a plaintiff was denied prejudgment interest in circumstances where allowing it would have resulted in a recovery that was more than the high end.

In short, “if there was any intention to preserve a claim for amounts beyond the high,” it was plaintiff’s obligation to state that expressly.  Since that did not happen, the high was a cap on recovery, and the Law Division’s decision to deny recovery under the offer of judgment rule was affirmed.  Trial lawyers in particular can derive an important lesson from today’s decision.

 

No Responses to “Offers of Judgment and High-Low Agreements”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Three More Grants of Certification by the Supreme Court - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] her right to recover fees?”  The opinion of the Appellate Division, which was discussed here, affirmed a ruling of…
  2. High-Low Agreement Did Not Permit Plaintiff to Recover Attorneys' Fees and Expenses Above the "High" Figure - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] v. Rothberg, ___ N.J. ___ (2018).  As discussed here, last year, the Appellate Division ruled in this medical malpractice…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Bruce D. Greenberg, a partner of Lite DePalma Greenberg, LLC, has more than 35 years of appellate experience.  He has argued dozens of cases in New Jersey’s Appellate Division, and he has handled oral arguments in the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals as well.  Mr. Greenberg’s appellate cases have ranged from . . more

 

Subscribe

  • reader reader
  • Subscribe to Appellate Law NJ Blog by Email

Archives

Links

  • An Appeal to Reason – California Appellate blog
  • Appellate Briefs
  • Class Action Blawg
  • De Novo- Virginia Appellate Law blog
  • Fast Five on Rhode Island Appellate Practice
  • Florida Appellate Review
  • How Appealing
  • Maine Appeals Blog
  • New York Appellate Law blog
  • NJ Judiciary
  • On Brief – Iowa Appellate Law Blog
  • Third Circuit Blog
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Categories

  • Administrative agency actions
  • Administrative matters
  • Appellate Division
  • Attorneys fees
  • Case management
  • Chancery issues
  • Class actions
  • Constitutional law
  • Consumer protection
  • Contract interpretation
  • Criminal law
  • Discovery
  • Effect of decisions by other courts
  • Judges
  • Jury issues
  • Municipal land use
  • Notable opinion writing
  • Pleadings
  • Practice Pointers
  • Standards of review
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Summary judgment
  • Supreme Court of New Jersey
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Uncategorized
  • United States Supreme Court

Tags

Administrative agency actions Appendix Arbitration Briefs Chief Justice Stuart Rabner Court Rules Family Part Grammar interlocutory vs. final decisions Judge Anthony Parrillo Judge Carmen Messano Judge Clarkson Fisher Judge D. Brooks Smith Judge Douglas Fasciale Judge Edwin Stern Judge Ellen Koblitz Judge Jack Sabatino Judge Jose Fuentes Judge Julio Fuentes Judge Kent Jordan Judge Marianne Espinosa Judge Marie Lihotz Judge Mary Catherine Cuff Judge Michael Haas Judge Mitchel Ostrer Judge Patty Shwartz Judge Stephen Skillman Judge Susan Reisner Judge Thomas Ambro Judge Thomas Hardiman Judge Thomas Vanaskie Judge Victor Ashrafi Justice Anne Patterson Justice Barry Albin Justice Helen Hoens Justice Jaynee LaVecchia Justice Lee Solomon Justice Roberto Rivera-Soto Law of the case Makeup of court Notice of appeal Prerogative writ appeals Standing Statute of limitations Waiver

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by Wordpress