Appellate Law NJ Blog
  • Home
  • Bruce Greenberg

Class Ascertainability- The Third Circuit Approaches the Precipice

Posted by Bruce D. Greenberg on Aug 22, 2013 in Class actions, Judges | 0 comments

Carrera v. Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013).  In Marcus v. BMW of North America, Inc., 687 F.3d 583 (3d Cir. 2012), the Third Circuit embarked on a very dangerous path in addressing the obligation of a putative class action plaintiff to prove that the proposed class is “ascertainable.”  Ascertainability is not even a requirement contained in Federal Rule of Cvil Procedure 23, which specifies the critieria for class action certification.  As discussed here, if not appropriately cabined, Marcus had the potential to block class certification in most cases involving retail products, such as aspirin, toilet paper, or most other consumer goods, where there is normally no complete record of who purchased the product at issue, either in defendants’ possession or elsewhere (as opposed to products such as automobiles, where the identities of purchasers and lessees are easily available from defendants).

Earlier this month, in Hayes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 725 F.3d 349 (3d Cir. 2013), discussed here, the Third Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Scirica, reversed another class certification ruling, based in part on the Marcus “ascertainability” language.  There was still the possibility that the court would cut back the loose language in Marcus that would make most consumer class actions uncertifiable.

Yesterday, however, Judge Scirica issued an opinion in this case, which involved allegations that Bayer had deceptively marketed its One-A-Day WeightSmart multivitamin dietary supplement pills.  Having lost a motion to certify a nationwide class under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, plaintiff sought a Florida class only, based on alleged violations of Florida consumer protection law.  The district court certified the class.  The Third Circuit reversed, relying on the Marcus “ascertainability” idea.  The panel rejected several arguments that plaintiff had made in support of his contention that the class was sufiiciently ascertainable.  Judge Scirica did, however, remand the matter to allow plaintiff to develop more evidence as to one of his proposed methods of satisfying ascertainability.  But that method was the most complicated, expensive and unwieldy one, involving, as it did, expert testimony on the issue.

As a result of this opinion, the Third Circuit has come perilously close to abrogating class certification in cases involving mass-marketed consumer products.  There are very few steps left before the court steps over the edge of the cliff.  Whatever the merit of an ascertainability criterion of some sort (and putting aside the fact that Rule 23 does not require it), the intent of the class action mechanism will be utterly defeated if the court does not turn back from its current path.  This decision should be reconsidered, taken en banc, or restricted in the next such case to reach the court.

No Responses to “Class Ascertainability- The Third Circuit Approaches the Precipice”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), an important but extremely unfortunate panel decision, as discussed here.  That is a case that should be…
  2. - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] multi-vitamin dietary supplement that is the subject of this case.  The discussion of Carrera here urged that either a panel rehearing or…
  3. - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] The District Court mistakenly viewed this question as one of ascertainability under Carrera v. Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300…
  4. - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] v. Bledsoe, ___ F.3d ___ (3d Cir. 2015).  In Carrera v. Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), a…
  5. - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] seen frequent criticism of the class action “ascertainability” doctrine espoused by Carrera v. Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d…
  6. A Retreat From the Third Circuit's Misguided Class Action Ascertainability Doctrine, and a Wise Concurrence by Judge Fuentes - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] Bank of North America Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (3d Cir. 2017).  Judge Scirica, who wrote the Hayes and Carrera…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Bruce D. Greenberg, a partner of Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC, has more than 35 years of appellate experience.  He has argued dozens of cases in New Jersey’s Appellate Division, and he has handled oral arguments in the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals as well.  Mr. Greenberg’s appellate cases have ranged from . . more

 

Subscribe

  • reader reader
  • Subscribe to Appellate Law NJ Blog by Email

Archives

Links

  • An Appeal to Reason – California Appellate blog
  • Class Action Blawg
  • De Novo- Virginia Appellate Law blog
  • Florida Appellate Review
  • How Appealing
  • Maine Appeals Blog
  • New York Appellate Law blog
  • NJ Judiciary
  • On Brief – Iowa Appellate Law Blog
  • Third Circuit Blog
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Categories

  • Administrative agency actions
  • Administrative matters
  • Appellate Division
  • Attorneys fees
  • Case management
  • Chancery issues
  • Class actions
  • Constitutional law
  • Consumer protection
  • Contract interpretation
  • Criminal law
  • Discovery
  • Effect of decisions by other courts
  • Judges
  • Jury issues
  • Municipal land use
  • Notable opinion writing
  • Pleadings
  • Practice Pointers
  • Standards of review
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Summary judgment
  • Supreme Court of New Jersey
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Uncategorized
  • United States Supreme Court

Tags

Administrative agency actions Appendix Arbitration Briefs Chief Justice Stuart Rabner Court Rules Family Part interlocutory vs. final decisions Judge Allison Accurso Judge Anthony Parrillo Judge Carmen Alvarez Judge Carmen Messano Judge Clarkson Fisher Judge D. Brooks Smith Judge Douglas Fasciale Judge Ellen Koblitz Judge Heidi Willis Currier Judge Jack Sabatino Judge Jose Fuentes Judge Julio Fuentes Judge Marianne Espinosa Judge Marie Lihotz Judge Mary Catherine Cuff Judge Mitchel Ostrer Judge Patty Shwartz Judge Stephen Skillman Judge Susan Reisner Judge Thomas Ambro Judge Thomas Hardiman Judge Victor Ashrafi Justice Anne Patterson Justice Barry Albin Justice Faustino Fernandez-Vina Justice Helen Hoens Justice Jaynee LaVecchia Justice Lee Solomon Justice Roberto Rivera-Soto Justice Walter Timpone Law of the case Makeup of court Notice of appeal Prerogative writ appeals Standing Statute of limitations Waiver

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by Wordpress