State v. Jones, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2017).  In the “old days,” when judicial opinions appeared only in books, there was a procedure for withdrawing an Appellate Division opinion that had been approved for publication.  At that time, paper volumes of opinions approved for publication were released every week.  When there were enough pages in those soft-covered issues to fill a volume of New Jersey Superior Court Reports, the weekly paper versions were replaced by the boun

The Supreme Court announced today the addition to three more cases to its docket.  The first of those appeals comes from a published opinion of the Appellate Division.  Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. Adelman, 447 N.J. Super. 391 (App. Div. 2016), discussed here.  The question presented, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office, is “In this defamation action, did posting an article on a website with minor changes from

The Supreme Court announced today that it has granted review in two more appeals.  One case involves unemployment benefits, a subject that the Court visits only occasionally.  The other is a criminal appeal.

The unemployment matter is Ardan v. Board of Review.  The question presented in that appeal, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office, is “Was this individual disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she left her employment at Lourdes Medical Center of Burlington County, Inc. without good cause attributable to the work?”  In a