Appellate Law NJ Blog
  • Home
  • Bruce Greenberg

Busy Days at the Third Circuit

Posted by Bruce D. Greenberg on Sep 17, 2019 in Constitutional law, Contract interpretation, Judges, Third Circuit Court of Appeals | 0 comments

Though the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Appellate Division are only just beginning to ramp up in the new Term, the Third Circuit has been pumping out published opinions in bulk, as it did late in August. Here are summaries of some of the five published opinions that the Third Circuit issued today:

Bank of Hope v. Chon, 938 F.3d 389 (3d Cir. 2019). This opinion by Judge Bibas resulted from a suit by plaintiff against a number of defendants. One of those defendants began sending letters to plaintiff’s shareholders, asserting that plaintiff’s claims were groundless and were ruining his reputation. At plaintiff’s request, the District Court banned that defendant from contacting plaintiff’s shareholders. On appeal, however, the Third Circuit reversed, finding that there was no evidence that this ban on the defendant’s speech was necessary to preserve the fairness and integrity of proceedings in this case, and the District Court had not considered less restrictive means. Accordingly, the ruling below violated the defendant’s First Amendment rights and could not stand.

Fed Cetera, LLC v. National Credit Services, Inc., 938 F.3d 466 (3d Cir. 2019). Defendant plaintiff’s assignor entered into an agreement providing, effectively, for payment of finder’s fees for any contract that defendant “consummated” during the term of the contract as a result of plaintiff’s introduction of defendant to the other contracting party. Defendant signed a contract with the federal government during the term of the agreement with plaintiff. But defendant did not begin to perform under the contract until after the finder’s fee agreement had expired. Plaintiff sued for the fee, but the District Court granted judgment on the pleadings, ruling that without some performance by defendant, the agreement with the government had not been “consummated.” In an opinion by Judge Fuentes that applied plenary review, the Third Circuit reversed. The agreement was “consummated” when it was formed, not when performance began.

Northeastern Pennsylvania Freethought Society v. County of Lackawanna Transit System, 938 F.3d 424 (3d Cir. 2019). This appeal produced a 2-1 split in the Third Circuit. Judge Hardiman wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge Porter joined. Judge Cowen dissented. Plaintiff sought to places in defendant’s public buses advertisements containing the word “Atheists,” along with plaintiff’s name and website. But defendant had a policy that excluded religious and atheistic messages from advertising on the buses. Accordingly, defendant rejected plaintiff’s ads. After a bench trial, the District Court ruled for defendant. But on appeal, the majority held that defendant’s policy violated the First Amendment.

No Responses to “Busy Days at the Third Circuit”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Busy Days at the Third Circuit, Part 2 - Appellate Law NJ Blog - […] Yesterday’s post noted that the Third Circuit has published a number of opinions in recent days. Here are summaries…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Bruce D. Greenberg, a partner of Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC, has more than 35 years of appellate experience.  He has argued dozens of cases in New Jersey’s Appellate Division, and he has handled oral arguments in the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals as well.  Mr. Greenberg’s appellate cases have ranged from . . more

 

Subscribe

  • reader reader
  • Subscribe to Appellate Law NJ Blog by Email

Archives

Links

  • An Appeal to Reason – California Appellate blog
  • Class Action Blawg
  • De Novo- Virginia Appellate Law blog
  • Florida Appellate Review
  • How Appealing
  • Maine Appeals Blog
  • New York Appellate Law blog
  • NJ Judiciary
  • On Brief – Iowa Appellate Law Blog
  • Third Circuit Blog
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Categories

  • Administrative agency actions
  • Administrative matters
  • Appellate Division
  • Attorneys fees
  • Case management
  • Chancery issues
  • Class actions
  • Constitutional law
  • Consumer protection
  • Contract interpretation
  • Criminal law
  • Discovery
  • Effect of decisions by other courts
  • Judges
  • Jury issues
  • Municipal land use
  • Notable opinion writing
  • Pleadings
  • Practice Pointers
  • Standards of review
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Summary judgment
  • Supreme Court of New Jersey
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Uncategorized
  • United States Supreme Court

Tags

Administrative agency actions Appendix Arbitration Briefs Chief Justice Stuart Rabner Court Rules Family Part interlocutory vs. final decisions Judge Allison Accurso Judge Anthony Parrillo Judge Carmen Alvarez Judge Carmen Messano Judge Clarkson Fisher Judge D. Brooks Smith Judge Douglas Fasciale Judge Ellen Koblitz Judge Heidi Willis Currier Judge Jack Sabatino Judge Jose Fuentes Judge Julio Fuentes Judge Marianne Espinosa Judge Marie Lihotz Judge Mary Catherine Cuff Judge Mitchel Ostrer Judge Patty Shwartz Judge Stephen Skillman Judge Susan Reisner Judge Thomas Ambro Judge Thomas Hardiman Judge Victor Ashrafi Justice Anne Patterson Justice Barry Albin Justice Faustino Fernandez-Vina Justice Helen Hoens Justice Jaynee LaVecchia Justice Lee Solomon Justice Roberto Rivera-Soto Justice Walter Timpone Law of the case Makeup of court Notice of appeal Prerogative writ appeals Standing Statute of limitations Waiver

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by Wordpress