The final two days of July saw one Supreme Court opinion and two published opinions by the Appellate Division. Here are summaries: New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency ...
Since last Friday, one week ago, the Appellate Division issued three published opinions (not counting its opinion in the Verizon case that the Supreme Court decided yesterday, in which the ...
Verizon New Jersey, Inc. v. Borough of Hopewell, ___ N.J. ___ (2024). This 6-0 per curiam opinion (Justice Fasciale did not participate) affirmed a 78-page opinion by Judge Accurso at ...
Chief Justice Rabner announced that Judge Accurso has been assigned to the Appellate Division’s Part C for the period of September 1, 2024-October 31, 2024. The relevant Order is here. ...
Arias v. County of Bergen, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2024). This was a personal injury case. Plaintiff fell in a hole and sustained injuries while rollerblading on a ...
The 2024-25 General Assignment has been issued and is available here. As was true in the 2023-24 Term, there are seven Parts. All but Part C, which has five judges, ...
While many took advantage of the fact that July 4 fell on Thursday of last week to close early on July 3 and/or remain closed on July 5, the Appellate ...
June came to a close last week. There were no Supreme Court decisions. The Appellate Division, however, issued five published opinions. Only one of them was discussed, here. Here are ...
Mims v. City of Gloucester, 479 N.J. Super. 1 (App. Div. 2024). Judge Perez Friscia wrote the Appellate Division’s opinion in this case. It deals with a subject not often ...
Patel v. New Jersey Department of Treasury, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2024). Judge Sabatino’s opinion in this case began by explaining its background and the novel issue presented:. ...