Appellate Law NJ Blog
  • Home
  • Bruce Greenberg

No Immediate Supreme Court Review of Challenge to COVID-19 Criminal Jury Trial Procedures, But Direct Certification After Trial Looks Likely

Posted by Bruce D. Greenberg on Oct 19, 2020 in Constitutional law, Criminal law, Supreme Court of New Jersey | 0 comments

As described in an Order of Disposition of Emergent Application in State v. Dangcil, the Supreme Court was presented with a motion “seeking leave to appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming the trial court’s denial of defendant’s order to show cause (OTSC) challenging the hybrid-virtual jury selection procedure adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” The Court concluded that defendant had not made a sufficient showing to obtain emergent relief, and that his trial, scheduled to begin today, would proceed. But that was not the end of the matter, as the Court went on to say.

“At the same time, the Court recognizes the importance of the issue raised by defense counsel. The Court’s denial of defendant’s interlocutory request for review and for a further stay of trial proceedings is without prejudice to defendant’s filing of a motion for direct certification of the issue to the Court post-trial. The Court would entertain such an application on an expedited basis together with a request to sever any appeal as to the jury selection process from any appeal on other issues raised in direct appeal, which issues could be considered by the Appellate Division in the ordinary course. In addition to the parties’ participation, leave to appear in any post-trial application to the Court is granted to the Public Defender, the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, the New Jersey State Bar Association, and the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey, should they wish to continue to participate in this case. No other entity may appear without permission of the Court.”

The Court has thus signaled that it would consider the issues raised once trial is concluded, and would do so on an expedited basis, through direct certification. The issues presented certainly are of broad public importance, as they affect criminal trials throughout the justice system for as long as the COVID-19 pandemic persists.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Bruce D. Greenberg, a partner of Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC, has more than 35 years of appellate experience.  He has argued dozens of cases in New Jersey’s Appellate Division, and he has handled oral arguments in the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals as well.  Mr. Greenberg’s appellate cases have ranged from . . more

 

Subscribe

  • reader reader
  • Subscribe to Appellate Law NJ Blog by Email

Archives

Links

  • An Appeal to Reason – California Appellate blog
  • Class Action Blawg
  • De Novo- Virginia Appellate Law blog
  • Florida Appellate Review
  • How Appealing
  • Maine Appeals Blog
  • New York Appellate Law blog
  • NJ Judiciary
  • On Brief – Iowa Appellate Law Blog
  • Third Circuit Blog
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Categories

  • Administrative agency actions
  • Administrative matters
  • Appellate Division
  • Attorneys fees
  • Case management
  • Chancery issues
  • Class actions
  • Constitutional law
  • Consumer protection
  • Contract interpretation
  • Criminal law
  • Discovery
  • Effect of decisions by other courts
  • Judges
  • Jury issues
  • Municipal land use
  • Notable opinion writing
  • Pleadings
  • Practice Pointers
  • Standards of review
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Summary judgment
  • Supreme Court of New Jersey
  • Third Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Uncategorized
  • United States Supreme Court

Tags

Administrative agency actions Appendix Arbitration Briefs Chief Justice Stuart Rabner Court Rules Family Part interlocutory vs. final decisions Judge Allison Accurso Judge Anthony Parrillo Judge Carmen Alvarez Judge Carmen Messano Judge Clarkson Fisher Judge D. Brooks Smith Judge Douglas Fasciale Judge Ellen Koblitz Judge Heidi Willis Currier Judge Jack Sabatino Judge Jose Fuentes Judge Julio Fuentes Judge Marianne Espinosa Judge Marie Lihotz Judge Mary Catherine Cuff Judge Mitchel Ostrer Judge Patty Shwartz Judge Stephen Skillman Judge Susan Reisner Judge Thomas Ambro Judge Thomas Hardiman Judge Victor Ashrafi Justice Anne Patterson Justice Barry Albin Justice Faustino Fernandez-Vina Justice Helen Hoens Justice Jaynee LaVecchia Justice Lee Solomon Justice Roberto Rivera-Soto Justice Walter Timpone Law of the case Makeup of court Notice of appeal Prerogative writ appeals Standing Statute of limitations Waiver

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by Wordpress