...
Jan
24
Jan
10
“Confusing,” “Contradictory,” and “Obscure” Provision of Consumer Contract Claimed to Mandate Arbitration is Held Not to Do So
Posted by Bruce D. Greenberg on Jan 10, 2019 in Class actions, Consumer protection, Contract interpretation, Effect of decisions by other courts, Judges, Standards of review, Supreme Court of New Jersey | 0 comments
...
Jan
9
Finkleman v. National Football League, ___ N.J. ___ (2019). This opinion by Justice Patterson today answers certified questions posed by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals arising out of a putative consumer class action. The questions involve N.J.S.A. 56:8-35.1 of the Ticket Resale Law, which was in force in 2014 but was repealed in 2018, effective as of February 1, 2019. That statute states that “[i]t shall be an unlawful practice for a person, who has access to tickets to an event prior to the tickets’ release for sale to the general public, to withhold those tickets from sale to the...
reader