Gonzalez v. Owens Corning, ___ F.3d ___ (3d Cir. 2018).  This putative class action case, brought by consumers in four states, asserted that “Oakridge” roof shingles sold by defendants (“Owens Corning”) were defective, and that defendants misrepresented the shingles’ useful life.  The District Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.  Plaintiffs sought interlocutory review of that ruling under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f),

City Select Auto Sales, Inc. v. David Randall Associates, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (3d Cir. 2018).  This Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) case, involving unwanted faxes, was tried to a jury as to the individual defendant, the former president and co-owner of the corporate defendant.  The jury returned a defense verdict.  Plaintiff appealed, complaining of the jury instructions regarding personal liability under the TCPA.  Applying

Empower our Neighborhoods v. Guadagno, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2018).  This was an election case under the federal and New Jersey civil rights acts, both of which provide attorneys’ fee-shifting in favor of a prevailing plaintiff.  At the trial level, Judge Mary Jacobson observed that the lawsuit brought by plaintiff, an advocacy group, had “changed the landscape of election law in New Jersey, as all 5.88 million registered voters in New Jersey now ha[d