Seigelstein v. Shrewsbury Motors, Inc., ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2020). When class action cases settle with a benefit to the class, class counsel, who normally handle those cases on a wholly contingent basis, are entitled to a fee. That fee is paid either as a percentage of the value of the class recovery or is paid by the defendant on top of the settlement for the class, based on either a percentage or on the “lodestar,” which comprises the number of hours reasonably billed multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate. Often, the fee is agreed upon in settlement negotiations....

Due to a personal matter, there have been no posts on this blog since June 2. This post will summarize some of the decisions from our appellate courts since that date. Separately, Governor Murphy nominated Fabiana Pierre-Louis to fill the Supreme Court seat currently held by Justice Timpone when he reaches retirement age in November of this year. A separate post, on another day, will discuss that nomination. Finally, the Supreme Court granted certification in one new case, Haley v. Board of Review. The question presented there, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk’s office, is...

Balducci v. Cige, 240 N.J. 574 (2020). In this case, as discussed here, the Appellate Division invalidated a retainer agreement in an opinion reported at 456 N.J. Super. 219 (App. Div. 2018). The panel also made some broad statements about how attorneys should conduct themselves in connection with retainer agreements in contingent fee matters, such as the Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-2 et seq. (“LAD”), which was at issue in the underlying action. Today, the Supreme Court, having granted certification and received amicus briefs from three Bar associations on the...