Landau v. Landau, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2019). The honor of the first published Appellate Division decision of the new Term goes to Judge Accurso in this matrimonial appeal. The issue, as Judge Accurso framed it, was “whether the changed circumstances standard of Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 157 (1980), continues to apply to a motion to suspend or terminate alimony based on cohabitation following the 2014 amendments to the alimony statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n).” In Lepis, the Supreme court ruled that “[a] prima facie showing of changed circumstances must be made...

Unlike so many judicial opinions, which leave the reader in suspense about the outcome until the end, the answer to this question, right up front, is “yes.” An Appellate Division opinion issued on this date in 1992 so stated. The opinion’s author was then-Judge (later Justice) Long. Burrell v. Quaranta, 259 N.J. Super. 243 (App. Div. 1992), involved the entire controversy doctrine, a notoriously thorny area of New Jersey law. The case arose out of several auto accidents resulting from the icing of liquid spilled on Route 73 from a Township of Maple Shade Sewage Treatment...

Yesterday, in an Order authored by Judge Natali, for himself and Judge Messano, the Appellate Division overturned a preliminary injunction against operation of the New Jersey Medical Aid in Dying for the Terminally Ill Act. The Appellate Division’s Order, which was thereafter affirmed by the Supreme Court, is available here. The Appellate Division elaborated on the standard for preliminary injunctive relief that was stated in Crowe v. DeGioia, 90 N.J. 126 (1982). The panel applied the abuse of discretion standard and concluded that the Law Division had abused its discretion in...